How bad is it? It's the Eurotrash of bad monster movies.
Should you see it? It's not required viewing.
 |
| Note the colored liquids (cf photo in last post) |
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds."
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Frankenstein's Castle of Freaks (1965)
aka House of Freaks, aka El Castello dell'Orrorre, aka Terror! Il Castello Della Donne Maledotte
How bad is it? It's the Eurotrash of bad monster movies.
Should you see it? It's not required viewing.
This is unusually clearly shot for a bad horror film, but that's the best that can be said for it; the scenes of naked women appear to have been carefully edited, but one still appreciates the scenery. Michael Dunn has one of his worst roles, just a typical dwarf assistant and there's a giant, a Neanderthal, and a hunchback. There are some mild chuckles to be had.
How bad is it? It's the Eurotrash of bad monster movies.
Should you see it? It's not required viewing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment