Should you see it? I didn't care for it, but it has its fans.
.jpg)
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds."
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Frankenstein's Daughter (1958)
How bad is it? It's very amateurish for a professionally made film.
Should you see it? I didn't care for it, but it has its fans.
This time it's never-mentioned-in-another-film Oliver Frankenstein that creates the monsters, so one wonders where the "Daughter" of the title comes in until one sees that there's a female monster. That monster, seen in the photo above,has make-up that stops at the neck and which looks like a bad Halloween mask. There's also another monster with a face that was half melted. It's a bit slow for my taste and is just typical 1950's fodder with poor production values.
Should you see it? I didn't care for it, but it has its fans.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment