How bad is it? It's slightly better than the original Psycho Cop, but it's still awful.
Should you see it? No.
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds."
Monday, June 30, 2014
Psycho Cop Returns (1993)
aka Psycho Cop 2
How bad is it? It's slightly better than the original Psycho Cop, but it's still awful.
Should you see it? No.
Upping the gore quotient and adding some nudity, our psycho cop returns (so at least the title's correct). This time, the whole movie is located in one building, keeping costs low, as a sort of "Die Hard" could've been made of this - but wasn't. The major difference this time out is that the bad guy gets caught, pummeled and kicked into submission; then there's the hospital scene (room 666, of course) where he gets away, apparently unharmed. The best thing about this is that there was no part 3.
How bad is it? It's slightly better than the original Psycho Cop, but it's still awful.
Should you see it? No.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment